# How to use a Righthand with Amplitude

Prepare a reviewed event-order interpretation brief from approved Amplitude inputs, with a worked example, complete brief, access checks, and reconciliation.

By Righthand Team · 2026-10-10

Source: https://www.righthand.ai/blog/how-to-use-righthand-with-amplitude

## Quick answer

Use an approved Amplitude funnel definition and result slice to prepare an event-order interpretation brief. The first useful job is explaining what the selected order rule counts, before the team interprets conversion changes.

Start with a **event-order interpretation brief** that the product analytics owner can check against the original records. Righthand prepares the review artifact; the source application remains the operational record.

## Establish the input route

Amplitude’s funnel setup guide distinguishes This order, Any order, and Exact order; Exact order excludes intervening events, while This order can allow them. [Official Amplitude reference](https://amplitude.com/docs/analytics/charts/funnel-analysis/funnel-analysis-build), checked October 6, 2026.

The analyst should provide the saved definition, selected cohort, window, and permitted illustrative event sequences. For a connected input, verify the project and report operation. Preserve the original definition rather than adjusting it to obtain a preferred answer.

Check the current [integration directory](/integrations) and [Righthand setup documentation](https://docs.righthand.ai/introduction). A listed app does not establish every read or write action. For a connected route, verify the assigned account, available operation, object scope, and one permitted sample read. This guide also works from an explicitly supplied, approved extract; it does not require an unverified native operation. Keep credentials out of the article brief.

## Worked input and output

These three records are synthetic illustrations, not customer results or a hands-on integration test.

| Approved input | Proposed review output |
| --- | --- |
| Sequence A→B→C for steps A,B,C | Matches the illustrative step order |
| Sequence A→X→B→C | Compare with selected rule: intervening X distinguishes Exact order from This order |
| Sequence C→A→B | Could meet Any order within the required window; does not show A then B then C |

These sequences explain rules, not observed customer behavior. The brief should quote the selected setting and show why each example is included or excluded under that setting. A difference between reports may be a definition difference rather than evidence that users changed their behavior.

## A complete first-run brief

> Use an approved Amplitude funnel extract and event-order definition for October 12–16, 2026. Fields: project reference, funnel reference, step events, order setting, conversion window, user/cohort filter, result count, event sequence. At Monday 9 AM America/Los_Angeles, prepare a event-order interpretation brief as source-linked Markdown in my private review thread. Preserve record identities and the extract timestamp. Group unresolved items by next action and responsible owner. Reviewer: product analytics owner. Do not change instrumentation, rewrite saved definitions, infer individual intent, or publish causal claims. Result check: Check the saved order rule, conversion window, and cohort; have the analyst classify all three sequences.

A permitted preparation step does not authorize a consequential write or an external send. Resolve proposed changes through the app's supported process after the responsible owner approves their exact scope.

## Reconcile before widening the task

An event name may refer to different versions of instrumentation. Record relevant property constraints and measurement changes before interpreting the sequence. Missing events in an incomplete extract cannot prove a user skipped a step; label the evidence limit instead.

Use one funnel in the next product-analysis meeting. Ask the analyst to walk through the A→X→B→C example and reproduce the chosen report. Retain the accepted interpretation beside the definition before preparing the next period’s comparison.

For the first acceptance review, keep the original input slice beside the result and mark which items were checked. If access or evidence is incomplete, return that gap with its record identity rather than a confident completion statement. Review [Pricing](/pricing) using the actual preparation workload and correction effort.